These are the stories for today...
Be safe out there!
Tom
-
Dallas Love Field and Dallas Fire-Rescue Unveil First Fully Electric Aircraft Fire Fighting Vehicle in the World
City News, Dallas Fire-Rescue
Dallas-Fire Rescue (DFR) and the Department of Aviation advanced safety, innovation, and sustainability in Dallas with the unveiling of the world’s first all-electric aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) vehicle at Dallas Love Field (DAL).
DFR, which provides fire protection and emergency medical services across the city, also oversees the specialized fleet of ARFF vehicles stationed at the airport. As part of ongoing modernization efforts, DFR and DAL deployed the new PANTHER 6×6 electric vehicle, manufactured by Rosenbauer International, on Wednesday, April 26, at the airport’s ARFF Station 21, enhancing both operational capability and environmental performance.
The new vehicle features include:
- 91,000 pounds of pure electric acceleration from 0 to 50 mph in under 25 seconds, under 20 seconds in “Boost Mode,” compared to 28 seconds for diesel.
- Increased master stream reach by 40%, extending from 190 feet to 250 feet, allowing crews to engage fires from a safer and more effective distance.
- Quiet electric motors delivering approximately 50% noise reduction during emergency responses compared to diesel operations.
”Innovation and new technology are a critical part of Dallas Fire-Rescue’s overall mission of rapid response, excellence in care, and the highest standards of safety,” said Justin Ball, Chief of the Dallas Fire-Rescue Department. “Adding the electric PANTHER 6X6 to our fleet equips our team with the latest in sustainable technology that will help us enhance our operational capabilities at Dallas Love Field.”
As the busiest medium hub airport in the United States, DAL serves almost 18 million passengers annually. The airport averages 675 aircraft operations daily, ranks second in the nation for private aircraft traffic, and has 100s of Fire-EMS related responses each year. This level of activity underscores the critical importance of maintaining world-class safety infrastructure and rapid response capabilities.
“Improved safety and operational resilience are always top of mind at DAL,” said Patrick Carreno, Director of Aviation at Dallas Love Field. “The presence and preparedness of our partner, Dallas Fire-Rescue, are invaluable to our airport. With the addition of the electric PANTHER 6×6, we are equipping them with a unique resource that enhances life-saving capabilities while supporting our commitment to energy efficiency and carbon neutrality.”
The introduction of the electric PANTHER 6×6 establishes a new benchmark in airport firefighting: delivering high-performance response capabilities while significantly reducing environmental impact.
Plane crashes near Knik Glacier, pilot seriously injured
Pilot was taken to a local hospital after crash involving fire
By Josiah Pike and Dani Tompkins
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) - A small plane crashed on a remote airstrip near Knik Glacier Tuesday, leaving the pilot with serious injuries, according to the Alaska State Troopers. 
AST received word of the crash at 7:55 p.m. Tuesday. Off-duty medical personnel who were already in the area reported the plane was “on fire upon impact” and provided aid.
The pilot was taken to a nearby hospital with what troopers characterized as “serious” injuries. No other injuries were reported. Witness statements were collected and the investigation into the cause of the crash is ongoing.
Clint Johnson with the National Transportation Safety Board told Alaska’s News Source on Wednesday that the aircraft was experimentally built.
“This is a fabric cover, tail dragger airplane — kind of resembles a Super Cub or a Maule,” Johnson said.
Austin McDaniel with the Alaska State Troopers added that it was a small, “single-engine, four-seat aircraft.”
McDaniel said the off-duty medical personnel were part of the group of 20 that were at the scene when the crash happened.
“They were in the area, they witnessed the plane crash, sprung immediately into action,” McDaniel said. “Removed him from the plane, as well as stabilized him until advanced medical care could get to the area, and then medevac him to an Anchorage area hospital for his serious injuries.”
LifeMed was notified and launched shortly after the crash.
McDaniel offered a reminder going into spring.
“When you’re out in the backcountry, bring some type of communication device that will allow you to communicate in the area that you were in,” he said. “That was pretty critical in this incident where first responders were able to get very fast notification that this crash had happened.”
https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2026/05/06/plane-crashes-near-knik-glacier-ast-says/
NTSB Prelim: Eric Vargosko SW-51
Upon Lifting Off He Noticed The Ball In The Slip/Skid Indicator Was Moving Right And Left
Location: Iron Station, NC Accident Number: ERA26LA169
Date & Time: April 10, 2026, 17:32 Local Registration: N551EV
Aircraft: Eric Vargosko SW-51 Injuries: 1 Serious, 1 Minor
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal
On April 10, 2026, about 1732 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur built SW-51 airplane, N551EV, sustained minor damage when it was involved in an accident near Iron Station, North Carolina. The front seat pilot sustained minor injuries, and the back seat pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.
The front seat pilot and owner reported that a new propeller had been installed on the airplane two days before the accident flight. The morning of the accident flight he was informed by the back seat pilot that flight testing with the new propeller had been accomplished. That afternoon they departed Gastonia Municipal Airport (AKH), Gastonia, North Carolina for a flight in the local area before landing at Lincoln County Regional Airport (IPJ), Lincolnton, North Carolina for fuel. He reported that they fully fueled the airplane and upon lifting off he noticed the ball in the slip/skid indicator was moving right and left. He informed the back seat pilot who took control of the airplane. The back seat pilot landed in an open field about 0.5 nautical miles from the departure end of runway 23 at IPJ.
The airplane was retained for further examination.
FMI: www.ntsb.gov
Today in History
15 Years ago today: On 7 May 2011 Merpati Nusantara flight 8968, a Xian MA-60, crashed into the sea while on approach to Kaimana Airport, Indonesia, killing all 25 occupants.
| Date: | Saturday 7 May 2011 |
| Time: | 14:05 |
| Type: | Xian MA60 |
| Owner/operator: | Merpati Nusantara Airlines |
| Registration: | PK-MZK |
| MSN: | 0603 |
| Year of manufacture: | 2007 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 615 hours |
| Cycles: | 764 flights |
| Engine model: | P&W Canada PW127J |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 25 / Occupants: 25 |
| Other fatalities: | 0 |
| Aircraft damage: | Destroyed, written off |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | 0,8 km SW off Kaimana-Utarom Airport (KNG) - Indonesia |
| Phase: | Approach |
| Nature: | Passenger - Scheduled |
| Departure airport: | Sorong-Dominique Edward Osok Airport (SOQ/WAXX) |
| Destination airport: | Kaimana-Utarom Airport (KNG/WASK) |
| Investigating agency: | NTSC |
| Confidence Rating: | Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
Narrative:
Merpati Nusantara flight 8968, a Xian MA-60, crashed into the sea while on approach to Kaimana Airport, Indonesia, killing all 25 occupants.
The airplane carried 19 passengers and six crew members. All on board were killed in the accident.
The airplane operated on Merpati flight MZ8968 from Sorong (SOQ) to Kaimana (KNG), Nabire (NBX), and Biak (BIK). The flight took off from Sorong at 12:50 for the one hour and four minutes flight to Kaimana. Cruising altitude was 15.500 feet and weather forecast for Kaimana indicated rain with a visibility of 8 km, half of the sky covered with clouds with cloud base at 1400 ft, winds from the southeast at 6 mph (5.2 kts) and temperature of 29°C.
At 13:25 the crew received updated weather information, indicating that visibility had decreased to 3-8 km, with cumulonimbus clouds at 1500 ft.
At about 13:37, MZ 8968 reported at 7 nautical miles from the airport, descending through an altitude of 8000 ft.
Five minutes later the Kaimana AFIS (Aerodrome Flight Information Service) officer informed the crew that it was still raining at the airport and the ground visibility was 2 kilometers.
During the approach to Kaimana, the flight crew flew to the south of the airport in an attempt to make a visual approach. The auto-pilot was disengaged at 960 feet pressure altitude. At 376 feet pressure altitude, the crew decided to discontinue the approach and climbed, turning to the left. Engine power was increased and flaps were retracted from 15 to 5 and subsequently to 0 degrees. The landing gear was also retracted. The aircraft rolled to the left with a bank angle of 11° and continuously increased up to 38°. The rate of descend increased significantly up to about 3000 feet per minute and the airplane finally impacted into the shallow sea.
Kaimana Airport has a single runway, 01/19 (asphalt, length 5249 feet / 1600 m) which runs parallel to the coast with the sea to the west and mountains to the east. The airplane crashed into the sea about 800 m southwest of the runway 01 threshold and 550 m from the beach. It broke up and sank to a depth of about 15 metres.
The airplane had been manufacturer in 2008. It was stored at the factory in Xian until it was delivered to Merpati in December 2010.
Factors contributed to the accident are as follows:
1. The flight was conducted in VFR in condition that was not suitable for visual approach when the visibility was 2 km. In such a situation a visual approach should not have been attempted.
2. There was no checklist reading and crew briefing.
3. The flight crew had lack of situation awareness when tried to find the runway, and discontinued the approach.
4. The missed approach was initiated at altitude 376 feet pressure altitude (250 feet radio altitude), the pilot open power to 70% and 82% torque followed by flap retracted to 5 and subsequently to 0. The rapid descent was mainly caused by continuously increase of roll angle up to 38 degree to the left and the retraction of flaps from 15 to 0 position.
5. Both crew had low experience/flying time on type.
6. Inadequacy/ineffectivity in the training program may lead to actions that deviated from the standard procedure and regression to the previous type.
