Skip to content

Monday the 18th of May, 2026

We kick off the week with these stories from over the weekend...

Be safe out there!

Tom

--

Reported cabin smoke, odor leads to emergency evacuation at KCI Friday afternoon

Dillon Seckington

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A flight at Kansas City International Airport (KCI) was reportedly evacuated after the cabin filled with smoke upon landing safely on the tarmac on Friday afternoon.

According to a spokesperson for KCI, Airport Flight and Rescue (ARFF) responded to an American Airlines flight, which had issued an emergency evacuation around 3:20 p.m. Friday.

Additionally, Kansas Congressman Tracey Mann posted a video of the evacuation to his social page on Friday.

“Our flight into Kansas City just made an emergency landing after the cabin filled with smoke. Thanks to our first responders, pilots, flight crew, and MCI staff, everyone is safely evacuated on the tarmac,” he said.

American Airlines said that the plane was evacuated on reports of an odor in the cabin. Passengers were then bused to the KCI terminal after getting off the plane on the taxiway.

“The safety of our customers and team members is our top priority, and we are sorry for their experience,” the airline said.

American Airlines shared that the flight was headed from Ronald Regan Washington National Airport in Washington D.C. to KCI.

Among the 76 fliers and four crew members, no injuries have been reported.

https://fox4kc.com/news/smoke-in-cabin-leads-to-emergency-evacuation-at-kci-friday-afternoon/amp/

Two U.S. Navy EA-18G Growlers Collide During Airshow At Mountain Home AFB, Crews Eject Safely

by David Cenciotti

Two EA-18G Growlers from the Growler Demo Team collided mid-air during the Gunfighter Skies Air Show at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho. All four crew members ejected.

A screenshot from the video circulated online apparently showing the midair collision on May 17, 2026. (Image credit: Shane Ogden)

Two EA-18G Growlers of the Growler Demonstration Team of the VAQ-129 “Vikings” crashed after being involved in a mid-air collision during the Gunfighter Skies Air Show at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho. A video apparently showing the incident shows the four crew members of the two aircraft ejecting.

Photographer Shane Odgen managed to film the entire sequence of the collision and subsequent ejections. He posted the video on Facebook here, the clip was later widely circulated online.

The kinematics of the mid-air collision are almost incredible. The video of the incident appears to show the two EA-18G Growlers coming into very close proximity during the display. As they converge, the lead aircraft appears to turn, resulting in apparent contact. Both aircraft then seem to pitch up or abruptly increase their angle of attack. The jets subsequently appear to depart controlled flight and begin losing altitude, looking almost entangled for a moment, although this impression may be partly due to lens compression, perspective and video distortion. Shortly afterward, the crew members eject.

A sequence of photographs show the two Growlers and the crew members right after the ejection.

The two aircraft were identified as being EA-18G 168895 “NJ-502” and EA-18G 168252 “NJ-540”.

The airshow was halted and the remainder of it cancelled after the incident, which occurred 2 miles to the northwest of the base.

The U.S. Navy stood up the EA-18G Growler Demo Team at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington in 2020. The team is made up of crews and aircraft from Electronic Attack Squadron 129 (VAQ-129), also known as “Vikings”, which is the Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) that is in charge of the training of all naval aviators that will fly the Boeing EA-18G Growler.

“While VAQ-129 has always been focused on training Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force aircrew, today our student body includes our Royal Australian Air Force partners. Our instructor staff includes aircrew from the Royal Australian Air Force, the British Royal Air Force, the United States Navy, the United States Air Force, and the United States Marine Corps”.

Until today’s accident, the Vikings maintained a fleet of 55 EA-18G Growler aircraft, according to their official website.

Two U.S. Navy EA-18G Growlers Collide During Airshow At Mountain Home AFB, Crews Eject Safely

Croatia Airlines A220 veers off runway during rejected takeoff

By Stephen Pope

A Croatia Airlines Airbus A220-300 veered off the runway during an aborted takeoff from Split Airport (SPU) in Kastela, Croatia, on May 16, 2026, damaging the aircraft but causing no injuries.

The aircraft, registered 9A-CAN, was operating as Flight OU412 from SPU to Frankfurt (FRA) when the crew rejected the takeoff on Runway 23. The aircraft departed the left side of the runway and came to rest partly on the grass.

Video posted online shows the A220 accelerating on the runway before drifting left and continuing onto the grass.

Croatia Airlines said 130 passengers and five crew members were on board, including two pilots and three cabin crew. All passengers and crew were safe, and no injuries were reported.

“Croatia Airlines’ Airbus A220-300 aircraft, registered 9A-CAN, which was scheduled to operate today’s regular international flight OU412 from Split to Frankfurt, aborted its takeoff at Split Airport,” the airline said in a statement cited by local media.

The cause of the runway excursion has not been determined.

Mate Melvan, head of passenger handling at Split Airport, told local media that the aircraft veered off the runway during its takeoff roll “for reasons yet unknown” and ended up partly on the grass. He said the aircraft was damaged after striking a vertical sign and runway edge lights.

The aircraft was later towed from the area. Operations at SPU resumed after the incident, though several flights were delayed, canceled or diverted.

The incident involved one of Croatia Airlines’ newest aircraft. The carrier has been renewing its fleet around the Airbus A220, with plans to move to an all-A220 fleet as older Airbus A319 and A320 aircraft leave service.

The Airbus A220-300, formerly developed as the Bombardier CSeries CS300, is the larger variant of the A220 family and is used by airlines on short- and medium-haul routes.

https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/croatia-airlines-a220-runway-excursion-split?trk=_publishing-image-block

Small plane hits light pole while making emergency landing on Tucson road

TFD said it happened near Park and Bilby around 2:45 p.m. Friday

By 13 News Staff and Katherine Patterson

TUCSON, Ariz. (13 News) - A small plane made an emergency landing near South Park Avenue and East Bilby Road in Tucson on Friday, May 15.

The Tucson Police Department said the biplane apparently hit a light pole after it was forced to land due to engine trouble, but there were no injuries.

The Tucson Fire Department said it happened around 2:45 p.m. and crews were on scene in five minutes. The TFD said the pilot walked away without injury.

As of 4 p.m., Park was still shut down from Mossman south to Bilby.

The TPD said the plane had taken off from the Chandler airport, and that the pilot was forced to land on the road due to engine trouble.

While the incident happened near the Tucson International Airport, the airport authority said the airport was not involved and is not handling the investigation.

There have been several small plane crashes in Arizona over the last few months, including a fatal one in Marana last month.

https://www.kold.com/2026/05/15/small-plane-crashes-tucson-near-park-bilby/

NTSB Prelim: Beech 58

A Witness Sitting In The Breezeway Of His Home Observed The Airplane In A Left Bank With A Nose Down Attitude Before It Impacted The Ground

Location: New Market, TN Accident Number: ERA26FA165
Date & Time: April 13, 2026, 13:08 Local Registration: N2063G
Aircraft: Beech 58 Injuries: 2 Fatal
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Instructional 

On April 13, 2026, about 1308 eastern daylight time, a Beechcraft 58 multi-engine airplane, N2063G, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near New Market, Tennessee. The flight instructor and the commercial pilot were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.

The commercial pilot, and airplane owner, was receiving an instrument competency check from the flight instructor when the accident occurred. A preliminary review of ADS-B data revealed that the airplane departed runway 26 at Knoxville Downtown Island Airport (DKX), Knoxville, TN, about 1241. It then proceeded northeast before turning to the southeast toward the BOTRE intermediate fix associated with the RNAV GPS RWY 10 instrument approach procedure to the Gatlinburg-Pigeon Forge Airport (GKT) Sevierville, Tennessee. Upon arrival at the BOTRE fix, it made a left turn toward GKT consistent with the approach procedure. The airplane then made a low approach over the runway before it turned north and executed the published missed approach procedure, which included a hold.

The airplane completed one circuit of the holding pattern before turning northwest toward New Market, Tennessee. A review of the last minute of the data revealed the airplane made a right turn toward the northeast as its groundspeed decreased to 17 knots, it then entered a steep descent toward the ground. The last data return was 1308:43 and coincided with the accident site.

A witness sitting in the breezeway of his home observed the airplane in a left bank with a nose down attitude before it impacted the ground. He did not recall hearing any engine noise or observing smoke or fire trailing from the airplane. Another witness was in her yard about 1.75 miles north-northeast of the accident site. She lived near an airport and was familiar with aircraft sounds, reported hearing the airplane fly over the river, and noted that it did not sound normal. Although she did not see the airplane; she stated that it sounded as if it were in a spiral. She further reported that the engine sound changed drastically, alternating between what sounded like full power and idle at 1 second intervals. This occurred several times immediately before she heard the airplane impact the ground.

The airplane impacted a clearing on a shallow hill in a nose-down attitude. Both engines were buried about 4 ft in the ground. The airplane sustained extensive impact damage, was heavily fragmented, and primarily consumed by post-impact fire. All of the airplane’s major components were located at the accident site.

The wreckage was retained for further examination.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

 

 

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 170

Pilot Observed An Abnormal Airspeed Indication And Aborted The Takeoff. The Airplane Then Overran The Runway

Location: Summerdale, Alabama Accident Number: ERA26LA101
Date & Time: January 29, 2026, 11:00 Local Registration: N4178V
Aircraft: Cessna 170 Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Runway excursion Injuries: 1 Minor, 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

Analysis: While attempting to take off from a 2,100-ft-long turf runway the pilot observed an abnormal airspeed indication and aborted the takeoff. The airplane then overran the runway, impacted a fence post with the left main landing gear, and nosed over resulting in substantial damage to the right wing and vertical stabilizer. After the accident, the pilot suspected that the pitot tube butterfly cover may have become stuck resulting in the erroneous airspeed indication.

Postaccident examination of the airplane’s pitot tube butterfly cover by an FAA inspector revealed no evidence of any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Had the pilot aborted the takeoff sooner, or continued the takeoff despite the airspeed indication anomaly, it is likely that the accident could have been prevented.

Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- The pilot’s decision to abort the takeoff with insufficient runway remaining, which resulted in a runway overrun and impact with a fence post.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

 

 

NTSB Final Report: American General Acft Corp AG5B

Following A Momentary Wind Shift, The Airplane Lost More Altitude And It Struck The Tops Of Trees Resulting In Substantial Damage To The Left Wing

Location: Fairfield, New Jersey Accident Number: ERA26LA096
Date & Time: January 15, 2026, 17:15 Local Registration: N59WM
Aircraft: American General Acft Corp AG5B Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Controlled flight into terr/obj (CFIT) Injuries: 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

Analysis: The pilot reported being on the downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern when a 16 to 24-knot tailwind pushed the airplane further from the runway than he had planned. While on final approach, the airplane was low with a headwind. Following a momentary wind shift, the airplane lost more altitude and it struck the tops of trees resulting in substantial damage to the left wing. Despite the impact, the pilot was able to clear the trees and land safely on the runway. The pilot also reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- The pilot’s failure to maintain an appropriate glide path during the landing approach in gusting wind conditions, resulting in an impact with trees prior to the runway.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Today in History

15 Years ago today: On 18 May 2011 SOL Líneas Aéreas flight 5428, a Saab 340, crashed near Prahuaniyeu, Argentina, following a loss of control in icing conditions, killing all 22 occupants.

Date: Wednesday 18 May 2011
Time: 20:48
Type: Saab 340A
Owner/operator: SOL Líneas Aéreas
Registration: LV-CEJ
MSN: 340A-025
Year of manufacture: 1985
Total airframe hrs: 41422 hours
Cycles: 44477 flights
Engine model: General Electric CT7-5A2
Fatalities: Fatalities: 22 / Occupants: 22
Other fatalities: 0
Aircraft damage: Destroyed, written off
Category: Accident
Location: 20 km N of Prahuaniyeu, RN -    Argentina
Phase: En route
Nature: Passenger - Scheduled
Departure airport: Neuquén Airport, NE (NQN/SAZN)
Destination airport: Comodoro General Enrique Mosconi International Airport, CB (CRD/SAVC)
Investigating agency:  JIAAC
Confidence Rating:  Accident investigation report completed and information captured

Narrative:
SOL Líneas Aéreas flight 5428, a Saab 340, crashed near Prahuaniyeu, Argentina, following a loss of control in icing conditions, killing all 22 occupants.

A Saab 340A passenger plane, registered LV-CEJ, was destroyed when it crashed 20 km north of Prahuaniyeu, Argentina. The 19 passengers and three crew members on board did not survive the accident.
The airplane operated on SOL Líneas Aéreas flight 5428 from Córdoba (COR) to Mendoza (MDZ), Neuquén (NQN) and Comodoro Rivadavia (CRD). The flight departed Neuquén at 20:05 for the final leg of the flight. The aircraft climbed to FL190. After flying for 24 minutes, the pilot levelled the aircraft at 17800 ft, and remained at this level for approximately 9 minutes.
When flying at FL179, the aircraft began to pick up ice. The copilot radioed air traffic control for permission to descent. The flight was then cleared down to FL140. However, while descending the crew members commented on the growing ice accretion on the wind shield and wings. By the time the aircraft had reached FL140, the icing conditions were severe. The aircraft flew for approximately two minutes with a straight and level flight attitude, increasing the accumulation of ice.
The airspeed dropped until the airplane stalled. The pilots attempted to regain control of the plane, but failed. The airplane impacted terrain and burned.

Cause:
During a commercial, domestic passenger flight, while cruising, the crew lost control of the aircraft, which uncontrollably impacted the ground due to severe ice formation caused by the following factors:
> Entering an area with icing conditions without adequately monitoring the warning signals from the external environment (temperature, cloudiness, precipitation and ice accumulation) or the internal (speed, angle of attack), which allowed for prolonged operations in icing conditions to take place.
> Receiving a forecast for slight icing - given that the aircraft encountered sever icing conditions - which led to a lack of understanding regarding the specific meteorological danger.
> Inadequately evaluating the risks, which led to mitigating measures such as adequate briefing (distribution of tasks in the cockpit, review of the de-icing systems, limitations, use of power, use of autopilot, diversion strategy etc.) not being adopted.
> Levels of stress increasing, due to operations not having the expected effects, which led the crew to lose focus on other issues.
> Icing conditions that surpassed the aircraft's ice protection systems, which were certified for the aircraft (FAR 25 Appendix C).
> Inadequate use of speed, by maintaining the speed close to stall speed during flight in icing conditions.
> Inadequate use of the autopilot, by not selecting the IAS mode when flying in icing conditions.
> Partially carrying out the procedures established in the Flight Manual and the Operations Manual, when entering into areas with severe icing conditions.
> Realizing late that the aircraft had started to stall, because the buffeting that foretells a stall was confused with the vibrations that signify ice contamination on the propellers.
> Activation of the Stick Shaker and Stall Warning at a lower speed than expected in icing conditions.
> Using a stall recovery technique which prioritized the reduction of the angle of attack at the expense of altitude loss, and which was inappropriate for the flight conditions.
> The aileron flight controls reacting in an unusual manner when the aircraft lost control, probably due to the accumulation of ice in the surfaces of these, which made it impossible for the aircraft to recover.
> The increasingly stressful situation of the crew, which affected its operational decision-making

Scroll To Top